From Utah...
Bill does actually call the guy kooky, right? Not just his ideas?
So I'm beginning to honestly collect my thoughts on how to defeat Bill O'Reilly. Unfortunately, it's a game of cat and mouse, and the only way to win is not to be the mouse.
Showing posts with label bill o'reilly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bill o'reilly. Show all posts
Thursday, August 2, 2007
Sunday, July 8, 2007
Who hates Mr. Rogers?
FOX News hates Mr. Rogers.
Where to begin...
I don't have a TV so I don't have to watch FOX News. I do see the occassional story from Hannity, Combs, John Gibson, and they're all fuckers. O'Reilly is no exception. (Thanks again to K.O.) Quite literally, Gibson makes me rather ill to look at him. I've heard the expression "having a face for radio." I think Gibson has a face for a shovel.
But now to slander Mr. Rogers? FOX and Friends, you cock-juggling thunder cunts...
Blame Mr. Rogers for students bitching about their grades. Blame a man that suggested that self-esteem could come from within, and not from the approval of others. Blame a man that devoted his life to making the world a better place. Do these things, then go fuck yourselves... perhaps with the same shovel that fixed Gibson's face.
What the world needs now is a villian. Yeah, a bad guy, a scapegoat. Preferably one that is so soft spoken he wouldn't get a word in a fair and unbiased debate. Oh, and if he's dead, that's a plus.
What's more, is that they invite a "doctor" on the show who acts as a "lifestyle contributor" and proceeds to provide a "common sense" perspective. Her resolution that Mr. Rogers is 'not so bad' after raising the issue that he may be the devil is worthy of drowning in baby shit. Try this on for size:
"Could the sun be the worst thing ever?"
"I mean, people get sun-burned."
"Lots of people are forced to wear lotions and sun-glasses."
"Seriously! Generations of people are forced to search for shade. Literally, kajillions of people have died due to dehydration caused by the sun!"
"Some people say that [insert current enemy in war on terror] might be behind the sun."
"But you know, I once saw a pretty sunset, so it's probably not all
bad."
And I don't know who I'm more mad at -- the (anonymous) person that did the study or fucking FOX News. I guess I can't really blame FOX for just being them. They are special. Kudos, FOX, now suck-start a gloc.
When the zombie uprising takes place, I would rather be bitten by Mr. Rogers than destroy his brain, but I somehow think even as a zed-word he'd retain some of that spirit.
Where to begin...
I don't have a TV so I don't have to watch FOX News. I do see the occassional story from Hannity, Combs, John Gibson, and they're all fuckers. O'Reilly is no exception. (Thanks again to K.O.) Quite literally, Gibson makes me rather ill to look at him. I've heard the expression "having a face for radio." I think Gibson has a face for a shovel.
But now to slander Mr. Rogers? FOX and Friends, you cock-juggling thunder cunts...
Blame Mr. Rogers for students bitching about their grades. Blame a man that suggested that self-esteem could come from within, and not from the approval of others. Blame a man that devoted his life to making the world a better place. Do these things, then go fuck yourselves... perhaps with the same shovel that fixed Gibson's face.
What the world needs now is a villian. Yeah, a bad guy, a scapegoat. Preferably one that is so soft spoken he wouldn't get a word in a fair and unbiased debate. Oh, and if he's dead, that's a plus.
What's more, is that they invite a "doctor" on the show who acts as a "lifestyle contributor" and proceeds to provide a "common sense" perspective. Her resolution that Mr. Rogers is 'not so bad' after raising the issue that he may be the devil is worthy of drowning in baby shit. Try this on for size:
"Could the sun be the worst thing ever?"
"I mean, people get sun-burned."
"Lots of people are forced to wear lotions and sun-glasses."
"Seriously! Generations of people are forced to search for shade. Literally, kajillions of people have died due to dehydration caused by the sun!"
"Some people say that [insert current enemy in war on terror] might be behind the sun."
"But you know, I once saw a pretty sunset, so it's probably not all
bad."
And I don't know who I'm more mad at -- the (anonymous) person that did the study or fucking FOX News. I guess I can't really blame FOX for just being them. They are special. Kudos, FOX, now suck-start a gloc.
When the zombie uprising takes place, I would rather be bitten by Mr. Rogers than destroy his brain, but I somehow think even as a zed-word he'd retain some of that spirit.
Monday, May 14, 2007
One night in Paris...
Of all the news in the world, I like this story.
Simply because he says shit like, "I'm too busy worrying about other shit to deal with this cunted cunt."
Which is the correct answer. Always.
She's a fucking drunk driver.
And people are signing a petition to save her? Why??? Because she's Oprah? Because she's L. Ron? Because she's Bill O'Fucking-Reilly? No! She's a dumb slut. And I don't mean in that in the deragotory way. I mean, seriously, she's dumb: watch her show. [Actually, don't.] And she's a slut: watch her movies. [Seriously, do.] Dumb sluts deserve what they get. And if it doesn't itch, they deserve harder.
Simply because he says shit like, "I'm too busy worrying about other shit to deal with this cunted cunt."
Which is the correct answer. Always.
She's a fucking drunk driver.
And people are signing a petition to save her? Why??? Because she's Oprah? Because she's L. Ron? Because she's Bill O'Fucking-Reilly? No! She's a dumb slut. And I don't mean in that in the deragotory way. I mean, seriously, she's dumb: watch her show. [Actually, don't.] And she's a slut: watch her movies. [Seriously, do.] Dumb sluts deserve what they get. And if it doesn't itch, they deserve harder.
Sunday, April 29, 2007
Bloviate me.
Let me first take Bill out of context. But can you really trust people that use the term "bloviate?" Seriously, you're supposed to forget that shit right after the SATs.
Yes, Bill, bloviate all night... all night long.
I know nothing about journalism, but...
A journalist, Bill, would know what a disclaimer is. He would also know how weak the language is. He would know that when you say you're not doing something, it's probably because you're going to do it. You're absolutely right, you would never demonize someone -- you are such the victim of an attack by the Public Broadcasting System.
A journalist, Bill, would not advocate dissent then stop someone (e.g., a professor of journalism) from dissenting. But I suppose if you are simply defending yourself, which is all any man can do, we can't criticize you for it. Let's defend ourselves... and let's do so by taking the fight to 'em.
A journalist, Bill? Bloviate me.
Look at it from another point of view. Imagine you're running your show. You know who's going to be on. You know what they're going to say. After all, you invited them. Now, also remember that your audience is a reactionary one, and your numbers are based on fear mongering and sensationalism. Add to it the fact that your entire network has been accused to being biased... what better way to prove you otherwise than to "invite" someone to your show from your own network that "disagrees" with you and show your distemper. Show us how much you WILL NOT STAND FOR IT. Show us how much you care that your reputation is being attacked. Make the whole thing look like you're both the victim and strong, staunch defender of journalistic news, and you've just executed a coup d'truth. gg Bill.
Yes, Bill, bloviate all night... all night long.
I know nothing about journalism, but...
A journalist, Bill, would know what a disclaimer is. He would also know how weak the language is. He would know that when you say you're not doing something, it's probably because you're going to do it. You're absolutely right, you would never demonize someone -- you are such the victim of an attack by the Public Broadcasting System.
A journalist, Bill, would not advocate dissent then stop someone (e.g., a professor of journalism) from dissenting. But I suppose if you are simply defending yourself, which is all any man can do, we can't criticize you for it. Let's defend ourselves... and let's do so by taking the fight to 'em.
A journalist, Bill? Bloviate me.
Look at it from another point of view. Imagine you're running your show. You know who's going to be on. You know what they're going to say. After all, you invited them. Now, also remember that your audience is a reactionary one, and your numbers are based on fear mongering and sensationalism. Add to it the fact that your entire network has been accused to being biased... what better way to prove you otherwise than to "invite" someone to your show from your own network that "disagrees" with you and show your distemper. Show us how much you WILL NOT STAND FOR IT. Show us how much you care that your reputation is being attacked. Make the whole thing look like you're both the victim and strong, staunch defender of journalistic news, and you've just executed a coup d'truth. gg Bill.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
